In a recent article in the July 24, 2021, edition of The Economist, titled, “Chinese cyber-attacks—Ctrl-alt-denounce—After failing to dissuade cyber-attacks, America looks to its friends for help,” you will find the following quote,

“For all the attention devoted to the Taiwan Strait and trade tariffs, cyber-espionage may be the most active mode of conflict between China and America—and America’s allies—for years to come.”
The article also draws attention to the recent publication of the following Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS) report: “Survey of Chinese Espionage in the United States Since 2000.”
It is a sobering reminder of China’s persistence to gain U.S. trade secrets by all conceivable legal and illegal means.
A review of this survey is recommended.
ADDITIONAL READING
*Prior IP Probe Blog posts on this topic:
Trade Secrets Thief Sentenced to 30 Months for Medical Institution Theft
China’s Notorious Thousand Talents Program – Equal Opportunity Recruiter – UPDATE
Risk Assessment re: China’s Proposed Amendment to Its Espionage Law
Book Review: The Scientist and the Spy. Review by Russell Atkinson
So…What is the China-Espionage “Thousand Grains of Sand” Theory?
U.S. Congress Message to China: You Need Not Bid
U.S. Educated Chinese Students–Abuse U.S. Temporary Work Program
China [Continuing] Trade Secrets Theft Initiative
Composition of a Chinese Trade Secrets Theft Enterprise: A Family Affair
China’s Notorious Thousand Talents Program–Equal Opportunity Recruiter
Another Apple Employee-Enroute to China—Arrested—Trade Secrets Theft
UK Private Prosecution—Nightmare for One Alleged Trade Secrets Thief
Composition of a Chinese Trade Secrets Theft Enterprise: Case Study
Disclaimer: IPPIBlog.com is a service to the professional IP community. While every effort has been made to check information in this blog, we provide no guarantees or warranties, express or implied, regarding the content provided in IPPIBlog.com. We disclaim all liability and responsibility for the qualification or accuracy of representations made by the contributors or for any disputes that may arise. It is the responsibility of the readers to independently investigate and verify the credentials of such persons and the accuracy and validity of the information provided by them. This blog is for general information only and not intended to provide legal or other professional advice.
0 comments on “Chinese State-Sponsored Espionage (a.k.a. IP Theft) Survey”